<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Shoot 92 Year Old Woman&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/</link>
	<description>My Daily Happenings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: taraden</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>taraden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>My sudden expressed sympathy?  Hmmm... I clearly do not remember saying &quot;Yay... they killed her, good for them!!&quot;  I never once claimed to be happy that this woman lost her life.  No that didn&#039;t happen until you came along and misconstrued what was said in the original post (and I might add... putting words into the original post that were simply not there to begin with) I will give you another example of this.... with saying that I said people do not have the right to self defense.
As for your statement that I should just &quot;limit my blog to pictures and discussions of lighthearted events like rock shows and things that you feel comfortable holding forth on&quot;.... that my friend is a very hypocritical statement for you to make.  After all this &quot;freedom to bear arms... freedom of self defense... freedom of free speech&quot;... and then you try to tell me what I should and should not blog about?  I can blog about whatever the hell I want to, just because you don&#039;t happen to  agree with my opinion... does not mean that I shouldn&#039;t be able to  speak my mind.   I don&#039;t sit at my computer 24 hours a day, logged into my blog waiting for someone to comment on a post that I wrote so that I can promtly write a response back...  so that does not mean that I am avoiding the comment or as you seem to want to put it have &quot;lapsed back into silence&quot;.  It does not mean that I am not entitled to my own opinion or that I am avoiding comments that have been left.  It simply means that I have a life... I work every day... I have a family and I have other things that I do with my time than to just sit around and wait for your response.
I can see that conversing with you is is definately exhausting.  What do you want me to say to you &quot;you are right and that I am wrong?&quot;  Or maybe you are wanting to hear &quot;you win.&quot;  Well you know what?  I am not going to say that to you.  You have not changed my opinion on this subject.  The only questionable part of the post that I wrote was &quot;I don&#039;t care how fucking old you are&quot;... and really I don&#039;t care how old she was.  Just because she was 92 years old doesn&#039;t make her actions more accountable.  Age doesn&#039;t matter and shouldn&#039;t matter.  She could have been 16 years old....  and the same thing could have happened.
As for terminating the conversation, I am about to do just that.  I am not going to sit around and let you (you I might add, who has not had the balls to leave a link to your own site) the chance to put words in my mouth.... and make more out of something then what was in the original post.  And if that is your idea of winning... then congratulations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sudden expressed sympathy?  Hmmm&#8230; I clearly do not remember saying &#8220;Yay&#8230; they killed her, good for them!!&#8221;  I never once claimed to be happy that this woman lost her life.  No that didn&#8217;t happen until you came along and misconstrued what was said in the original post (and I might add&#8230; putting words into the original post that were simply not there to begin with) I will give you another example of this&#8230;. with saying that I said people do not have the right to self defense.<br />
As for your statement that I should just &#8220;limit my blog to pictures and discussions of lighthearted events like rock shows and things that you feel comfortable holding forth on&#8221;&#8230;. that my friend is a very hypocritical statement for you to make.  After all this &#8220;freedom to bear arms&#8230; freedom of self defense&#8230; freedom of free speech&#8221;&#8230; and then you try to tell me what I should and should not blog about?  I can blog about whatever the hell I want to, just because you don&#8217;t happen to  agree with my opinion&#8230; does not mean that I shouldn&#8217;t be able to  speak my mind.   I don&#8217;t sit at my computer 24 hours a day, logged into my blog waiting for someone to comment on a post that I wrote so that I can promtly write a response back&#8230;  so that does not mean that I am avoiding the comment or as you seem to want to put it have &#8220;lapsed back into silence&#8221;.  It does not mean that I am not entitled to my own opinion or that I am avoiding comments that have been left.  It simply means that I have a life&#8230; I work every day&#8230; I have a family and I have other things that I do with my time than to just sit around and wait for your response.<br />
I can see that conversing with you is is definately exhausting.  What do you want me to say to you &#8220;you are right and that I am wrong?&#8221;  Or maybe you are wanting to hear &#8220;you win.&#8221;  Well you know what?  I am not going to say that to you.  You have not changed my opinion on this subject.  The only questionable part of the post that I wrote was &#8220;I don&#8217;t care how fucking old you are&#8221;&#8230; and really I don&#8217;t care how old she was.  Just because she was 92 years old doesn&#8217;t make her actions more accountable.  Age doesn&#8217;t matter and shouldn&#8217;t matter.  She could have been 16 years old&#8230;.  and the same thing could have happened.<br />
As for terminating the conversation, I am about to do just that.  I am not going to sit around and let you (you I might add, who has not had the balls to leave a link to your own site) the chance to put words in my mouth&#8230;. and make more out of something then what was in the original post.  And if that is your idea of winning&#8230; then congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anson Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Anson Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>I am very much aware that this is YOUR blog. I am also very much aware that your sudden expressed sympathy is in conflict with your original sentiment (&quot;I don&#039;t give a fuck how old she was...&quot;). She has now become sadly dead.

Living alone was probably her idea as well so I am uncertain what you would have had the family do there. We do not give up the right to choose with age.

And finally, officers or freelance thugs, you point the gun in the direction it needs to go; which is to say muzzle toward the bad guys.

If you wish to terminate the discussion, say so or lapse back into silence. But don&#039;t expect those of us who are concerned with liberty to pass by a statement like the one you made (&quot;guns are bad&quot;)

Are automobiles bad too?  They weigh in at thousands of pounds and travel at injurious velocities and are frequently piloted by aging operators.

Perhaps since this is not to your taste you should limit your blog to pictures and discussions of lighthearted events like rock shows and things you feel comfortable holding forth on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very much aware that this is YOUR blog. I am also very much aware that your sudden expressed sympathy is in conflict with your original sentiment (&#8220;I don&#8217;t give a fuck how old she was&#8230;&#8221;). She has now become sadly dead.</p>
<p>Living alone was probably her idea as well so I am uncertain what you would have had the family do there. We do not give up the right to choose with age.</p>
<p>And finally, officers or freelance thugs, you point the gun in the direction it needs to go; which is to say muzzle toward the bad guys.</p>
<p>If you wish to terminate the discussion, say so or lapse back into silence. But don&#8217;t expect those of us who are concerned with liberty to pass by a statement like the one you made (&#8220;guns are bad&#8221;)</p>
<p>Are automobiles bad too?  They weigh in at thousands of pounds and travel at injurious velocities and are frequently piloted by aging operators.</p>
<p>Perhaps since this is not to your taste you should limit your blog to pictures and discussions of lighthearted events like rock shows and things you feel comfortable holding forth on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taraden</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>taraden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>I do understand that in my country as in yours people have the right  to bear arms... as do I understand the right to freedom of speech.  As for (as you put it) the complete dismissal that I have given to the comments above... I simply do not feel like entertaining the argument.  I have not disappeared into silence... I have been here all along reading every single comment that has been left on this post... as it is in fact MY blog.  I  have never said that people do not have the right to self defense and personally I really think that you have taken this post far out of it&#039;s context.  Whether the lady was in the right or not.... I was merely pointing out the fact that in this day and age it is simply not a good idea to be pointing a gun and firing it at officers.... as they are most likely going to return fire. And sadly this ended in this womans death.   And I do still feel that this poor woman should probably not have been living all by herself.... this even more so, after reading the link that GalapagosPete left above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do understand that in my country as in yours people have the right  to bear arms&#8230; as do I understand the right to freedom of speech.  As for (as you put it) the complete dismissal that I have given to the comments above&#8230; I simply do not feel like entertaining the argument.  I have not disappeared into silence&#8230; I have been here all along reading every single comment that has been left on this post&#8230; as it is in fact MY blog.  I  have never said that people do not have the right to self defense and personally I really think that you have taken this post far out of it&#8217;s context.  Whether the lady was in the right or not&#8230;. I was merely pointing out the fact that in this day and age it is simply not a good idea to be pointing a gun and firing it at officers&#8230;. as they are most likely going to return fire. And sadly this ended in this womans death.   And I do still feel that this poor woman should probably not have been living all by herself&#8230;. this even more so, after reading the link that GalapagosPete left above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anson Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Anson Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Taraden, no one is challanging your right to an opinion. When you insist on taking refuge behind ignorance or, worse yet, &quot;willfully misunderstanding&quot; something like a freedom that one is born with however, it cries out for a response.
Your right to free speech is by no means any safer than your right to self defense. When one is in danger they are all at risk.
Consider the clear dismissal you have given the comments listed above. By disappearing into silence you are availing yourself of a right (free speech does indeed include silence) just as surely as one who is fighting for their life with every means at their disposal. What will you do when the day comes that you need arms and armed companions to defend that right you hold dearly? Do you think it can&#039;t or won&#039;t come to that? Do you believe that governments can and do restrict speech?
An opinion is formed by an underlying principle. By your de facto acceptance of the right to free speech but not the right to self defense you find yourself in the uncomfortable position of applying your principle unevenly. That is, IMHO, what drew the responses we see written above. To paraphrase a philosopher, the pillow of ignorance you have lain your head upon must be a very comfortable one since you use it so frequently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taraden, no one is challanging your right to an opinion. When you insist on taking refuge behind ignorance or, worse yet, &#8220;willfully misunderstanding&#8221; something like a freedom that one is born with however, it cries out for a response.<br />
Your right to free speech is by no means any safer than your right to self defense. When one is in danger they are all at risk.<br />
Consider the clear dismissal you have given the comments listed above. By disappearing into silence you are availing yourself of a right (free speech does indeed include silence) just as surely as one who is fighting for their life with every means at their disposal. What will you do when the day comes that you need arms and armed companions to defend that right you hold dearly? Do you think it can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t come to that? Do you believe that governments can and do restrict speech?<br />
An opinion is formed by an underlying principle. By your de facto acceptance of the right to free speech but not the right to self defense you find yourself in the uncomfortable position of applying your principle unevenly. That is, IMHO, what drew the responses we see written above. To paraphrase a philosopher, the pillow of ignorance you have lain your head upon must be a very comfortable one since you use it so frequently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlb7718</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>wlb7718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>the lady was not in the wrong i would have done the same thing under the circumstances,  if 3 armed men enter my house in plain clothes and yielding a pistol, shotgun , or even a knife sorry to say ur gonna get shot with out hesatation especially given the area she lived in, i say good for the cops who got hit maybe they will learn to finally get their stuff straight .  i think who ever was i charge of the investigation or who ever handled the case and got the stuff mixed up in the first place, their ass should hang for that and the death of a innocent 92 year old woman&#039;s death will ride on their conscience for the rest of their life ,  i would say &quot;helpless old woman &quot;  but ... she odviously was far, far from helpless  she took down 3 highly trained officers who probly were prior military and do this for a living  day in and day out   most criminals dont even get to hit 1 yet alone 3  she must have spent some time at the range  i&#039;d say she was a pretty good shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the lady was not in the wrong i would have done the same thing under the circumstances,  if 3 armed men enter my house in plain clothes and yielding a pistol, shotgun , or even a knife sorry to say ur gonna get shot with out hesatation especially given the area she lived in, i say good for the cops who got hit maybe they will learn to finally get their stuff straight .  i think who ever was i charge of the investigation or who ever handled the case and got the stuff mixed up in the first place, their ass should hang for that and the death of a innocent 92 year old woman&#8217;s death will ride on their conscience for the rest of their life ,  i would say &#8220;helpless old woman &#8221;  but &#8230; she odviously was far, far from helpless  she took down 3 highly trained officers who probly were prior military and do this for a living  day in and day out   most criminals dont even get to hit 1 yet alone 3  she must have spent some time at the range  i&#8217;d say she was a pretty good shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taraden</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>taraden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-814</guid>
		<description> &quot;Starting to fell a little picked on?&quot;  No not really  :D  we live in a world where everyone has their own opinions.  Just as you have yours,  I have mine.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Starting to fell a little picked on?&#8221;  No not really  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   we live in a world where everyone has their own opinions.  Just as you have yours,  I have mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GalapagosPete</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>GalapagosPete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Taraden,

Starting to feel a little picked-on? Well, I&#039;m afraid you have it coming, at least somewhat.

You have made the mistake of reading only one short version of the story. There is a much longer and more complete recounting of the events at

http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?id=33703&amp;siteSection=1

that you should have read before commenting on the story. When you say, &quot;If police were to come to my door… and I have commited no crime…I think I have a little more self control and wit about me than to start firing aimlessly at people, just because I am startled...&quot; it makes you seem more than a little foolish, since what they did was, &quot;...break...through the burglar bar door before breaking down her front door.&quot; I think you&#039;ll agree that&#039;s a little more than &quot;coming to the door&quot; and &quot;startling&quot; her.

When you understate the events, then make a disparaging and vulgar comment about her age, you invite criticism for sloppy thinking.

&quot;A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.&quot; Shane, 1953</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taraden,</p>
<p>Starting to feel a little picked-on? Well, I&#8217;m afraid you have it coming, at least somewhat.</p>
<p>You have made the mistake of reading only one short version of the story. There is a much longer and more complete recounting of the events at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?id=33703&amp;siteSection=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?id=33703&amp;siteSection=1</a></p>
<p>that you should have read before commenting on the story. When you say, &#8220;If police were to come to my door… and I have commited no crime…I think I have a little more self control and wit about me than to start firing aimlessly at people, just because I am startled&#8230;&#8221; it makes you seem more than a little foolish, since what they did was, &#8220;&#8230;break&#8230;through the burglar bar door before breaking down her front door.&#8221; I think you&#8217;ll agree that&#8217;s a little more than &#8220;coming to the door&#8221; and &#8220;startling&#8221; her.</p>
<p>When you understate the events, then make a disparaging and vulgar comment about her age, you invite criticism for sloppy thinking.</p>
<p>&#8220;A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.&#8221; Shane, 1953</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julius</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Using only their Rules:

I do not know if this raid against her person and property was at 2:00 am. when it was dark. We do not know if this raiding party was visible to her as &quot;police&quot; in the lighting conditions, distracting noises, etc. 

I automatically give her the benefit of doubt. She faced a raiding party.
She knew she was not in the Drug dealing business, or other Illegal activity. She knew she needed to take action into her own hands, if she was to have a chance to live at all.

The Police, if that is what they claim to be, were at the wrong address, plain and simple. Their authority to operate inside private property came ONLY after a valid search warrant was issued listing the CORRECT address at which to operate. 

I fail to see how any initiating acts upon their part against the wrong address can be excused. They and their employer should be liable for damages times three and whatever a Jury wants to levy.

I fail to see how their initiating force event against this old lady can be excused at all. I hope her heirs end up owning everything those officers own for many decades to come.

There is no excuse for getting the wrong address in this day and age. Badge or no Badge. This shows a total lack of professional dedication to their duty to ascertain where they are and who they may be pointing their guns at.
Only arrogance can explain such sloppy, non professional work. 

It stands to reason that if they were at the correct address, anyone firing on them would generate justification to return fire.
 
&quot;IF&quot; you knew for absolute certain you were entering the correct home that had a valid search warrant. They weren&#039;t. They didn&#039;t.

Face it. The officers involved _screwed the pooch_

The simple fact is, the policeman on the beat who knew everyone in his neighborhood would not have knocked on the wrong door. 

This conspiracy against people called the war on some drugs has fuelled far too many injuries to communities and our culture.

Testosterone and training has something to do with this.

The lust to have Control over others has much to do with this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using only their Rules:</p>
<p>I do not know if this raid against her person and property was at 2:00 am. when it was dark. We do not know if this raiding party was visible to her as &#8220;police&#8221; in the lighting conditions, distracting noises, etc. </p>
<p>I automatically give her the benefit of doubt. She faced a raiding party.<br />
She knew she was not in the Drug dealing business, or other Illegal activity. She knew she needed to take action into her own hands, if she was to have a chance to live at all.</p>
<p>The Police, if that is what they claim to be, were at the wrong address, plain and simple. Their authority to operate inside private property came ONLY after a valid search warrant was issued listing the CORRECT address at which to operate. </p>
<p>I fail to see how any initiating acts upon their part against the wrong address can be excused. They and their employer should be liable for damages times three and whatever a Jury wants to levy.</p>
<p>I fail to see how their initiating force event against this old lady can be excused at all. I hope her heirs end up owning everything those officers own for many decades to come.</p>
<p>There is no excuse for getting the wrong address in this day and age. Badge or no Badge. This shows a total lack of professional dedication to their duty to ascertain where they are and who they may be pointing their guns at.<br />
Only arrogance can explain such sloppy, non professional work. </p>
<p>It stands to reason that if they were at the correct address, anyone firing on them would generate justification to return fire.</p>
<p>&#8220;IF&#8221; you knew for absolute certain you were entering the correct home that had a valid search warrant. They weren&#8217;t. They didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Face it. The officers involved _screwed the pooch_</p>
<p>The simple fact is, the policeman on the beat who knew everyone in his neighborhood would not have knocked on the wrong door. </p>
<p>This conspiracy against people called the war on some drugs has fuelled far too many injuries to communities and our culture.</p>
<p>Testosterone and training has something to do with this.</p>
<p>The lust to have Control over others has much to do with this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.J. Totty</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>E.J. Totty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Taradan,

The attitude you express is nothing short of arrogance: The idea that self-defence is unwarranted.

Canada isn&#039;t exactly crime free – not that it ever has been. The fact – and you seem to go out of your way to ignore this – that the lady who was murdered by the local police, lived in part of town with a high crime rate.

You seem to exhibit the high and mighty liberal Canadian attitude, that you are somehow morally superior to most – if not all – Americans, just because you dislike firearms.

Why don&#039;t =you= go and live where she did, and please tell the rest of us how safe you feel while doing so. 

Please =DO= post a sign outside the doorway stating that you refuse to arm yourself, and that if attacked, why you&#039;ll lay there and take it, nice pacified liberal Canadian that you say you are.

Or, are you just gonna stay in Canada, and point fingers at your neighbors across your southern border, with all the pretentiousness you can muster?

Tell you what: It&#039;s really too bad that the old gal wasn&#039;t a better shot, and managed instead shot dead the jackboots, every damned last one of them.

When the fascists come a-beating,
And people like you go a-bleating,
Afraid to question anything they say or do,
Then you will come to know,
What&#039;s been planned for you and go,
And wonder why you didn&#039;t act sooner, 
Instead to have fought against them and Proclaimed a loud and emphatic &#039;no!&#039;

Guns are bad news for facists out to harm others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taradan,</p>
<p>The attitude you express is nothing short of arrogance: The idea that self-defence is unwarranted.</p>
<p>Canada isn&#8217;t exactly crime free – not that it ever has been. The fact – and you seem to go out of your way to ignore this – that the lady who was murdered by the local police, lived in part of town with a high crime rate.</p>
<p>You seem to exhibit the high and mighty liberal Canadian attitude, that you are somehow morally superior to most – if not all – Americans, just because you dislike firearms.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t =you= go and live where she did, and please tell the rest of us how safe you feel while doing so. </p>
<p>Please =DO= post a sign outside the doorway stating that you refuse to arm yourself, and that if attacked, why you&#8217;ll lay there and take it, nice pacified liberal Canadian that you say you are.</p>
<p>Or, are you just gonna stay in Canada, and point fingers at your neighbors across your southern border, with all the pretentiousness you can muster?</p>
<p>Tell you what: It&#8217;s really too bad that the old gal wasn&#8217;t a better shot, and managed instead shot dead the jackboots, every damned last one of them.</p>
<p>When the fascists come a-beating,<br />
And people like you go a-bleating,<br />
Afraid to question anything they say or do,<br />
Then you will come to know,<br />
What&#8217;s been planned for you and go,<br />
And wonder why you didn&#8217;t act sooner,<br />
Instead to have fought against them and Proclaimed a loud and emphatic &#8216;no!&#8217;</p>
<p>Guns are bad news for facists out to harm others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Davidson</title>
		<link>http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraden.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/police-shoot-92-year-old-woman/#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Clearly, anyone actually defending themselves from thugs in law enforcement is a good person.  Anyone in law enforcement is, by definition, a parasite.  The government gets its money by killing people who won&#039;t pay taxes.  Taxation is theft or, at its best, extortion.

Any other view of these things is statist, authoritarian nonsense.

What next?  A military draft so the USA fedgov can continue massacring civilians in Iraq?  Are we going to go back to the days of LBJ and how many kids did he kill, today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, anyone actually defending themselves from thugs in law enforcement is a good person.  Anyone in law enforcement is, by definition, a parasite.  The government gets its money by killing people who won&#8217;t pay taxes.  Taxation is theft or, at its best, extortion.</p>
<p>Any other view of these things is statist, authoritarian nonsense.</p>
<p>What next?  A military draft so the USA fedgov can continue massacring civilians in Iraq?  Are we going to go back to the days of LBJ and how many kids did he kill, today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
